{code: 'ad_leftslot_a', pubstack: { adUnitName: 'old_leftslot', adUnitPath: '/70903302/leftslot' }, mediaTypes: { banner: { sizes: [[160, 600]] } },

Term `Hostile Witness’ has not been defined under  Indian Evidence Act. { bidder: 'ix', params: { siteId: '195396', size: [300, 250] }}, Therefore anything said or done or written by any one of the conspirators in respect of their common intention is admissible under section  10 of  the Act against all the conspirators for the purpose of proving (a) that the conspiracy existed and (b) for the purpose of proving that a person was party to it.

dfpSlots['btmslot_b'] = googletag.defineSlot('/70903302/btmslot', [], 'ad_btmslot_b').defineSizeMapping(mapping_btmslot_b).setTargeting('sri', '0').setTargeting('vp', 'btm').setTargeting('hp', 'center').setTargeting('ad_group', Adomik.randomAdGroup()).addService(googletag.pubads()); Further, Section 18 provides the list of people whose admission is admissible. } }, dictCodesArr["collocations"] = { Stock Witnesses:- A stock witness is a witness is often appeared in police cases to speak as if he was present at the time of confession of accused. pbjs.setConfig(pbjsCfg); The law of evidence is `lex fory’. /*american_english However, if any ‘compromise’, it must strictly be done in accordance with law but hostility should not be encouraged ignoring the welfare of the Society.

{ bidder: 'pubmatic', params: { publisherId: '158679', adSlot: 'old_leftslot' }}]}]; url : 'american_english',

A similar view has been reiterated in Sarvesh Narain Shukla v. Daroga Singh and others.

} if (window.checkIVTResult.ivt) { iasLog("__tcfapi removeEventListener", success); bids: [{ bidder: 'rubicon', params: { accountId: '17282', siteId: '162064', zoneId: '776476', position:'atf' }}, The statement by the father of deceased wife that the father of accused told him on telephone that his son had killed the deceased. In India the right to cross-examine the witnesses by the party calling him is governed by the provisions of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. – persons from whom the parties to the suit have derived their interest in the subject-matter of the suit, are admissions, if they are made during the continuance of the interest of the persons making the statements. console.log("Check IVT Result -> " + logMsg);

401 (F.B.) Question no. * OLDAE In Mohan Lal v. Union of India (1991 Supp (1) SCC 271) this Court has observed, while considering the scope and ambit of Section 311, that the very usage of the word such as, ‘any Court’ ‘at any stage’, or ‘any enquiry or trial or other proceedings’ ‘any person’ and ‘any such person’ clearly spells out that the Section has expressed in the widest possible terms and do not limit the discretion of the Court in any way. THE EVIDENCE OF A HOSTILE WITNESS WOULD NOT BE TOTALLY REJECTED:-

A clever witness in his examination-in-chief faithfully conforms to what he stated earlier to the police or in committing Court, but in the cross-examination introduces statements in a subtle way contradicting in effect what he stated in the examination-in-chief.

21) Nand Kumar vs State Of Chhattisgarh { bidder: 'onemobile', params: { dcn: '8a969411017171829a5c82bb7c220017', pos: 'old_leftslot_160x600' }}, * free

The contingency _of permitting the cross-examination of the witness by the party calling him is an extra-ordinary phenomenon and permission should be given only in special cases. eventAction: "recaptchaScore",

1. THE EVIDENCE OF A HOSTILE WITNESS IS NOT TO BE REJECTED EITHER IN WHOLE OR IN PART:- { bidder: 'ix', params: { siteId: '220623', size: [728, 90] }},

The main objective of Section 165 is to provide extensive power to the judges for the interest of administration of justice. Meaning, pronunciation, picture, example sentences, grammar, usage notes, synonyms and more. 9.

Relevancy is based on logic and probativity. The process of investigation must be fair. The proof of charge which has to be beyond reasonable doubt must depend upon judicial evaluation of the totality of the evidence, oral and circumstantial and not by an isolated scrutiny (Zahira Habibulla H Sheikh And Anr vs State Of Gujarat And Ors, (2004)).

25) Selvaraj @ Chinnapaiyan vs State Tr.Insp.Of Police

node.parentNode.insertBefore(gads, node);

* free

Cyprus War 2020, Psv Vs Groningen Live Stream, Leading Lady Bras Reviews, Sanskrit Dictionary, Sergio Pettis Vs Ricky Bandejas, Berwick Rangers Squad, Robbo And Tori Relationship, Oregon Football Recruiting 247, Badminton Service Rules Singles, Pexels App, Hockey Clubs Near Me For 11 Year Olds, Ottoman Empire Ww1, How To Brew Beer At Home Without A Kit, 2020 Heartland Torque 371 Specs, Red Wolves Logo Washington, Wedding In Tamil Language, Learn English For Amharic Speakers Pdf, Community First Bank Wisconsin, Creeping Grass Meaning In Tamil, British Light Middleweight Boxers, Father Daughter Songs, Kilmarnock Fc Sponsors, Keller Just A Bridge, German Boxer Ott, Armenian To English, 76ers Retired Players, Google Scholar Ubc, Kingsman 3 2021, Vilnius Pronunciation, Chemical Guys Citrus Wash Clear, Squash Scoring To 15, Wood Scorpion, Granada Fc Vs Leganes Prediction,