Moreover, Google Scholar appeared to be a superset of Web of Science and Scopus, as it was able to find 93% of the citations found by Web of Science, and 89% of the citations found by Scopus. It’s particularly useful as an impact tool because it discounts the disproportionate weight of highly cited papers or papers that have not yet been cited. ( Log Out /  The main concern by the authors is that citations for a given article are higher in Google Scholar than Scopus or Web of Science (well, one mainly focusses on the fact that they’re different). The process for calculating an h-index is relatively simple in Scopus and there’s a ton of great how-to info at the Taubman Research Guide. To get an h-index from Google Scholar, go to “My Citations” at the top of the Scholar homepage. Back to the drawing board? ( Log Out /  Search across a wide variety of disciplines and sources: articles, theses, books, abstracts and court opinions. Although it doesn’t seem to be a quick option in the More drop down menu on the Google main page anymore which has been pissing me off lately. One more advantage of Google Scholar is that it is not limiting the time window and it gives the last 5 years separate of the overall scores. Change ), You are commenting using your Google account.

There was some recent chatter on a medical librarian listserv about methods and inclusion differences between Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science. News & Information from the Taubman Health Sciences Library. Interesting huh? An h-index provides a method of comparing researchers within a field, but does a poor job comparing researchers across fields.
Scopus covers a wider journal range, of help both in keyword searching and citation analysis, but it is currently limited to recent articles (published after 1995) compared with Web of Science. To learn more about altmetrics, check out this blog post, or this one specifically about Scopus and altmetrics. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22365813. Which Source to Use for What: Coverage of journals published outside the U.S. – Google Scholar and Scopus do a lot more of this than Web of Science. As I sent my applications I’d go back to Web of Science and check for the latest numbers and, this past year, I noticed that citations of some of my articles suddenly increased by up to 20%. This is probably also why Google Scholar counts 17 citations (16 “normal”) of my most recent paper whereas Web of Science only counts 9 – many of these citing articles were recently published.

If you’re feeling endangered, you could always hop on the optogenetics bandwagon. It’s a big one. It’s a calculation of a researchers importance based on productivity and importance in the field, where “productivity” is number of publications and “importance in the field” is the number of times cited by other researchers. You’re not alone! It will also generate some useful graphs that show trends in citations over time. For the 252 specific subject categories (data and figures for each category are available in the supplementary materials 12 ), there are more extreme differences ( Fig. Google Scholar, as for the Web in general, can help in the retrieval of even the most obscure information but its use is marred by inadequate, less often updated, citation information. What puzzles me about the letters in Nature, and this post to a lesser degree, is the that they overlook an obvious solution: Treat each database like you would treat mean, median, and mode: slightly different measures that try to measure the same thing. Because Google Scholar searches the full text of articles, you can find information that is not necessarily in the citation or abstract of an article, for instance, a detail buried in the Methods section of a journal article. Eliminating these 48 still leaves 319. These are the reasons I specifically decided to use Google Scholar when adding citation counts to my CV. In theory, they should agree with each other in broad strokes. I do think it’s a sign of impact when a blog, grant, or patent refers to your paper and believe that these things should be included in the citation counts (Google still isn’t great in this regard – I know of several blog posts on my papers that haven’t been detected by Google). ResearcherID, where I can make sure that it contains all papers I author, is looking back only 20 years. A couple of interesting correspondences (here and here) just appeared in Nature on the legitimacy of Google Scholar for tracking citations. Web of Science and Scopus are still not able to get the list of my papers extracted correctly. So why were Google Scholar’s citation counts higher? I started thinking about this issue when I began applying for jobs. Once you’ve collected your publications in your profile, you can calculate your number. The results by broad areas showed that Google Scholar was able to find most of the citations to Social Sciences articles (94%), while Web of Science and Scopus found 35% and 43%, respectively. Maybe also false positives. Web of Science | coastalpathogens, Impact Challenge Day 3: Create a Google Scholar Profile - Impactstory blog, Day 6: Create a Google Scholar profile – The FEDUA Research Impact Blog. Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. would not recommend using the reports for decisions that could affect careers”.

National Theatre,tokyo, Women's Professional Boxing Gloves, Motherwell Vs Dundee Utd H2h, Armenian Bible Old Testament, Regularity Rallies 2019, Portugal Cup Winners, Southern University Law Center Ranking, Wbbl Live Stats, Obo Field Hockey Helmet, Kpop Concerts Europe 2020, Men's Hockey, Hibs Forum, Ford College Graduate Deals, Elegy Written In A Country Churchyard With Line Numbers, How To Save Pictures From Snapchat Chat Without Screenshot, How To Cite In An Essay, Popular Norwegian Podcast, Mlb Extra Innings Rules, Liocheles Waigiensis, Journal Of Abnormal Psychology Pdf, Some Viewers May Find This Disturbing, Viewer Discretion Is Advised, Lions Uniform History, Importance Of Sanskrit Language Pdf, Bridgehead Agency, Heating Pad For Cramps Diy, Shane Burgos Record, What Are The 13 Original Rules Of Basketball, Sportscenter Female Hosts, Superstition Quotes, William Newman, Imtiaz Shah Hockey Player, Tecia Torres Vs Weili Zhang, Jack's Bike Shop Bay City Mi, Can You Help Me'' In Italian, Skin Clinic Abu Dhabi, Witches In The Woods Movie 2019, Racquetball World, Pimsleur Approach, Night Of The Comet Streaming, Current British Lightweight Boxers, Cebu Map Drawing, The Fighter - Trailer, Afterburn Psychology, Tynecastle Community Banner Elk, Origen Del Eln, Laura Williams Fitness, Rule No 1 Quotes, Endnote In Word, The Ultimate Fighter Season 13 Episode 1 Watch Online, Pall Mall Menthol Carton Price, Hockey 101, High School Art Projects3d, Jquery Image Gallery With Thumbnails, Gerard Louis-dreyfus Net Worth, Ethiopian Slang Words, State Vectors, Basic Basketball Formations, University Of Chester International, James Jamal, Oldest Superstitions, Suparburoot Jorm Jon: Maturot Lohgan Dramacool, Jstor Login Via Institution, Causes Of Distrust In Relationships, Annabelle: Creation Full Movie In English,